Thursday, July 14, 2016

facts you need to know about iriz car



Proton Iriz Review




The all-new Proton Iriz city car has been officially unveiled in Malaysia.
The long-awaited successor to the unloved and already-discontinued Savvy, the Iriz follows the lead of the Preve,Suprima S and Exora in featuring the car maker’s sharp design language, new engines, and modern technology and safety features.
The Proton Iriz is available with two four-cylinder petrol engines. The smallest of the duo is a 1.3-litre unit that produces 70kW of power at 5750rpm and 120Nm of torque at 4000rpm. The larger 1.6-litre makes 80kW and 150Nm, peaking at the same engine speeds as the smaller motor.
Both engines can be paired with either a five-speed manual transmission or an automatic continuously variable transmission (CVT).
Proton quotes combined cycle fuel consumption of 6.6-7.4 litres per 100 kilometres for the larger engine, which claims an 11.1-second 0-100km/h sprint.
The five-door Proton Iriz is 3920 millimetres long, 1722mm wide, 1554mm tall, and rides on a 2555mm wheelbase, making it similar in size to the Holden Barina hatch.
Safety features available in Malaysia include electronic stability control, hill-start assist, six airbags (dual front, side and curtains), reverse-view camera and rear sensors.
Other specification highlights include 14- or 15-inch alloy wheels, auto headlights, daytime running lights, keyless entry with push-button start, leather upholstery, and a four-speaker infotainment system teamed to a 6.2-inch screen with Bluetooth phone and audio streaming, front and rear USB inputs, DVD player, satellite navigation and WiFi integration
Proton Australia chief operating officer Kaye Aimes told CarAdvice the local division would “dearly love” to introduce the Iriz to our market, but said it was still awaiting confirmation from head office.
Aimes said Proton executives are coming to Australia next week to assess the local market and business case for the Iriz and to make a decision for our market.
If approved, Aimes said the Iriz could go on sale around the second quarter of 2015.

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Tips on choosing a battery for proton

 


Malaysia cars battery size/application guide Proton Battery Replacement Size

With the vast array of auto batteries on the market, choosing the right one can be confusing. A basic consideration is the physical size of the car battery, and your vehicle manufacturer’s requirements. Cost is another consideration. Maintenance-required car batteries are inexpensive, but usually don't last as long as maintenance-free batteries.Find the correct car battery replacement for your vehicle is very important. 
The following is a battery used for proton

Vehicle ModelOriginal SizeOptional Upgrade
Proton ArenaNS60NS70
Proton ChancelloraNS60NS70
Proton Exora55D23L/80D23L
Proton Gen2DIN55R
Proton Inspira55D23L/80D23L
Proton IrizNS60
Proton Iswara 1.3,1.3S Aeroback, 1.3S SedanNS60S
Proton JuaraDIN55
Proton Satria Neo 1.3/1.6DIN55R
Proton Perdana 2.0 Sedan/Executive/Limo/Enchanced VersionNS60S/NS70NX110-5/85D26R 
Proton PersonaDIN55R
Proton Preve55D23L/80D23L
Proton Putra 1.8L Exi DOHCNS60S/NS70
Proton Saga 1.3, 1.5S, 1.5i, KnightNS60S
Proton Saga BLMNS60
Proton Satria 1.3, 1.3GLi, 1.6, 1.8 GTiNS60SNS70
Proton SavvyNS60LS
Proton Suprima55D23L/80D23L
Proton TiaraDIN55L
Proton Waja 1.6/Premium Edition, 1.8 DOHCNS60LSNS70L
Proton Waja 2.0L ExecutiveNS60LSNS70L
Proton Waja CamproNS60LSNS70L
Proton Wira 1.3, 1.3GL, 1.5, 1.5GL, 1.6, 1.8NS60SNS70
Proton Wira 1.8EXLi, Aeroback, 2.0 DieselNS60SNS70

Future competition for protons


Malaysia's carmaker Proton driving in search of a future


 
The new Iriz by Malaysia's national automaker Proton is showed to the press before Thailand International Motor Expo at Muang Thong Thani in 2014. (Proton photo)
KUALA LUMPUR - Malaysia's struggling national automaker Proton Holding Bhd, once the country's sales leader, recently saw its fortunes slip further by seeing its market share usurped by Japan's Honda Motor Co.
"That is very shocking for everybody," veteran auto reporter Chips Yap told Kyodo News of the fact that Honda beat Proton in the latter's much-protected home turf.
The company once dominated the industry with 74% of the local market in 1993 but now has only 14%.
After being the top carmaker for years, it slipped to the number two spot in 2006, beaten by rival local carmaker Perusahaan Otomobil Kedua Sdn Bhd, or Perodua, which counts Japan's Daihatsu Motor as a major shareholder.
But this year, national pride was dented when Honda beat Proton to the number two spot, becoming the number one non-national brand. For the month of April, Honda sold 24,741 units while Proton sold 23,702 units. Perodua, which specialises in compact cars, was far ahead with 62,078 units, according to figures from the Malaysian Automotive Association, an industry watchdog.
The ails affecting Proton were laid bare by Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak when he unveiled on June 14 Proton's latest model that he hoped will boost Proton's sagging fortunes.
"Proton flourished, yes, but only due to a very high level of government help. Our car industry grew under the umbrella of protectionism, with quotas on engine sizes and Malaysians paying high import duties on foreign cars," he said.
Since the company was established in 1983 by then prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, Najib said the government has spent nearly 14 billion ringgit (120 billion baht) in the form of grants, various forms of assistance and tax forgone.
The latest handout was a 1.5 billion ringgit loan extended in April to enable Proton to pay its vendors. Early this month, 1.25 billion ringgit of that amount was used to buy convertible shares from Proton's owner DRB-Hicom Bhd.
If the government chooses to convert the debt into shares, it will again end up holding nearly 80% of Proton.
Besides lacking research and development capabilities and having a negligible export market, many of the company's problems stem from political interference.
Proton, Southeast Asia's only full-fledged car manufacturer, was Mahathir's brainchild. He saw it as a catalyst to promote industrialisation in an economy that relied heavily on commodities.
According to Yap, he was heavily involved in its operations, ranging from company strategy, management, right down to designs and sometimes this involvement delayed the decision-making process.
And at times Mahathir's lofty ambitions for Proton did not make business sense, such as building a second plant in Tanjung Malim in northern Perak state that cost 1.8 billion ringgit and is five times bigger than its first plant in Shah Alam in the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur.
"At times there was a sense of hubris, that Proton could do anything because the government would always back it. Two factories were built, capable of producing 400,000 units a year. But last year Proton sold only 102,000 cars," Najib said.
Throughout Mahathir's 22-year rule, Proton was untouchable despite dwindling sales and bleeding money that led to several government interventions.
When he left office in 2003, he was made an adviser to the carmaker and subsequently its chairman, a position he held until becoming entangled in a protracted row with Najib, whom he accused of being corrupt.
The feud affected Proton as the government was reportedly holding out on its request for more grants to help it pay off its debt.
Mahathir ultimately quit as Proton chairman on March 31. A week later, the government announced a 1.5 billion ringgit loan package that came with conditions.
Among them, Proton is to relocate its operations from Shah Alam to Tanjung Malim, draw up a turnaround plan and seek a foreign strategic partner to help in research and development in order to make it competitive to help it expand locally and abroad.
The government also announced the setting up of a task force to ensure the restructuring is successful.
Najib said the government had to step in to ensure the welfare of the 12,000 employees of Proton and 50,000 workers of its 350 vendors.
"Now, I am pleased to say, there have been significant changes at the top levels of Proton. Tun Mahathir's era of political interference has come to an end," he said.
Writing in his widely read blog five days after he quit, Mahathir attempted to deflect criticism away from Proton, saying the company had given more than it took from the government.
He said that since 1985, it has contributed 24.9 billion ringgit to the treasury in the form of various taxes like excise duty, sales tax and corporate tax.
He complained that the government has been too accommodating with foreign carmakers.
"Incidentally all the countries exporting cars to Malaysia implement tariff and non-tariff barriers resulting in excluding Proton's importation into their countries. This contrasts with our policy of allowing foreign cars to enter Malaysia with minimal or no restrictions," he said.
"It should be noted that Proton has to compete in its own domestic market against the likes of Toyota (10 million cars per annum), South Korean carmakers (5 million cars), German carmakers (6 million cars) and others," Mahathir added.
For the moment, Proton may have gotten a lifeline to stay afloat to enable it to launch new models. Besides the Perdana sedan model that was launched by Najib last week, which is a collaboration with Honda, Proton is expected to come up with three more models including one in collaboration with Suzuki Motor.
Hong Leong Investment Bank in a June 7 research note on DRB-Hicom pointed to a not-so-rosy outlook for the auto arm of the conglomerate.
Proton is acting as a financial drag on DRB-Hicom, which reported a net loss of 991.9 million ringgit for the year ended March 31 against a profit of 300.2 million ringgit a year ago.
The bank highlighted the risks due to "prolonged bank tightening measures on lending rules, slowdown of the Malaysia economy affecting car sales and global automotive supply chain disruption."
"The new launches should cushion the cash-flow requirements and survivability in the short to medium terms. However, Proton needs a strong partner to lead it into the international level playing field with improved products and technologies," the bank said.
Proton rolled out its first car in 1985 with a tie-up with Mitsubishi Motors Corp. The joint venture floundered in 2004, due to Mitsubhishi Motors' financial problems in Japan and sluggish sales in Malaysia.
Proton's then owner, sovereign investment fund Khazanah Holdings, approached German's Volkwagen AG as a potential partner. But those talks broke down due to opposition to Volkswagen's plan to acquire a controlling stake in Proton.
Local media reports that Proton is currently in talks with the French PSA Group, which owns the Peugeot and Citroen brands as well as Renault.
Another auto journalist Yamin Vong is skeptical a deal could be struck, citing the Volkswagen experience.
"The managers at Proton are generally not in favor of the PSA Group's bid," he wrote in an article published by the official news agency Bernama early this month, "This is to be expected whenever a takeover bid looms. Also, the perception that the Proton culture is one that rejects changes is very credible."
"The companies that will really want Proton as a partner for Malaysia and the Asean markets are brands that do not have an Asean presence and desire to have a significant share in the regional bloc," Vong said, referring to the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations

Talk about comparison between proton Iriz, SagaFLX, Persona and Preve



14 

Want To Buying a Proton Iriz? Here's My Advice

A couple of my friends and relatives kept asking me, if the new Proton Iriz is worth buying (probably because I used to work at Proton. *sigh*). And by ‘worth buying’ I assume they meant ‘worth spending their hard earned money on’. So here’s the OTR price list and what other Proton model that you might get if you add some amount to the Iriz OTR price.

1.3 Standard CVT: RM 45,888.00 (=Saga FLX 1.3 Executive CVT)
1.3 Executive CVT +RM4,000 (=Persona 1.6 AT SV)
1.6 Executive CVT +RM11,000 (=Persona 1.6 AT Executive)
1.6 Premium CVT +RM17,000 (=Preve 1.6 CVT Executive)


Kind of pricey and confusing right? FYI, the comparison above are based on monthly commitment for 9 years loan. I’m sure most of us will be looking at the full spec variant, so I figure it’s best to highlight the specs against the price.








Based from the above price list, we can see that 1.6 variant will cost you RM7,000 more than the 1.3 and the difference between 1.6 Premium and 1.6 Executive is RM6,000. What do you get for an extra RM6,000? You can see the list below

1. Sunvisor Extension
2. Side Airbags
3. Curtain Airbags
4. Anti-trap Power Window (Driver side only)
5. Electronic Gear Shift Lock
6. Auto Headlamp
7. Daytime Running Lights (DRL)
8. Auto Fold side mirror
9. Keyless Entry
10. Push start button
11. Leather wrap steering wheel.
12. Leather seats
13. Leather Door Trim insert

Quite a long list right? At least only 3 out of the 13 can be ignored.
So here’s my advise. Based on the given information above and my recent test drive in a 1.3 MT Executive, all I can say is please avoid the 1.3 variant if you can. And based on the Premium and Executive specs, if you think all the 13 items mentioned really help you make the decision, then RM6,000 different is worth it. Besides, it’s not that you can easily find after-market parts for, example, the airbags and all the leather interiors.
Now we have a winner. If you want to buy Iriz, get the full spec. Period. If not, you are better off with a Persona 1.6 AT Executive instead.



Car functionalites and specifications is my main priority when it comes to buying a car. The logic is that simple. Comparing a full spec Myvi with a full spec Proton Preve, I’m sure we all can agree that based on brochure data, Proton Preve is a much better choice. Even on the road the performance and handling is undeniably better. It’s bigger, wider…the list goes on. But why do most people still drive a Myvi? Now that’s a price to pay for fuel efficiency and proven reliability. 


IMG_0095.JPG





Long story short, you now have full spec Iriz against Preve 1.6 CVT Executive. So what are your preferences? Fuel efficiency? Proven reliability? As far as the Iriz is concern, Proton wouldn’t even dare to reveal any fuel efficiency and consumption figure inside their Iriz official brochure. (There’s a claim that the 1.6 variant will give you 5.4 liter/100km in a steady 110kmh highway drive. We are not sure, but if you do, share your comments!) Being skeptical myself, I would rather go for Preve instead. Unless, you are willing to pay for the design, aftermarket accessories and gadgets as well as upgraded quality of the interior, then Iriz is surely yours.